On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 outbreak a global pandemic. And then the whole world went crazy. Nations around the world began imposing lockdowns, restricting gathering sizes, restricting business activities and mandating social distancing and masking. Manitoba declared a state of emergency on March 20 and implemented its first lockdown on April 1 (it was no joke) ordering the closure of all “non-essential businesses”.

Initially, we were told that the lockdowns were necessary to “slow the spread.” But, over the next six months, the restrictions kept changing because government health organizations really didn’t know what they were doing. It was all guess work or trial and error.

One of the social distancing requirements was to stay two metres apart from each other. Dr. Anthony Fauci recently admitted that the two-metre rule basically came out of thin air. There was no science to back it up. And, at the beginning of the pandemic, Dr. Fauci didn’t think masking was necessary. Then he changed his mind. Wearing masks was required after all.

Since that time, studies have been done that indicate that masks were neither effective for protecting the wearer from COVID-19 or for preventing transmission of the virus to others. One researcher simply pointed out that the holes in the masks were bigger than the size of the virus!

Over the next two years, the various restrictions took their toll. Restaurants and other businesses could not afford to stay open and shut down. People succumbed to fear and many lost their jobs. Families were forced to stay in their homes except when they needed to buy food. They dictated how many people could gather in public places, including places of worship. It got so ridiculous that you weren’t even allowed to worship out loud because you might spread the virus! You were supposed to just stand there and mouth the words. At some point, the Manitoba government even restricted how many people could gather in their own homes.

Back in May 2020, President Trump announced Operation Warp Speed, a public–private partnership initiated to facilitate and accelerate the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. These vaccines would save us from the pandemic, they said. It turns out that, three years earlier in 2017, Bill Gates was already deeply involved with funding and discussing in public what President Trump unveiled as Operation Warp Speed.

And in October 2019, just 10 weeks before the COVID-19 outbreak first began in Wuhan, China, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation co-hosted a pandemic preparedness simulation of a “novel coronavirus”, known as Event 201, along with the John Hopkins Center for Health Security and Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum. It was a dress rehearsal for the COVID-19 pandemic. What a coincidence.

When you do a little digging, you find out that a key part of the COVID-19 response plan was to short circuit the normal lengthy testing and approval process and provide Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines”. New medicines and vaccines cannot qualify for Emergency Use Authorization if any existing FDA-approved drug proves effective against the same disease. If any FDA-approved drug proved to be effective against COVID-19, Pfizer and Moderna would no longer be legally allowed to fast-track their lucrative vaccines to market under Emergency Use Authorization. Did any such drugs exist? Yes – hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and ivermectin.

HCQ had a long history of safe medical use. In the United States, the FDA had approved it for over 60 years. Studies showed that it was safe and effective as an early treatment protocol against coronavirus. Former President Trump himself endorsed HCQ on March 19, 2020. Ivermectin had a 40-year track record of being a safe drug.

Beginning in March 2020, doctors began finding through clinical trials that ivermectin was also effective for prevention and treatment against COVID-19. This explains the all-out offensive against these two drugs and the campaign to slander and demonize ivermectin as a horse dewormer. One reputable doctor said it well: “the idea that ivermectin is a horse dewormer that poses lethal risk to humans is pure horse manure.”

Typically, vaccines contain a weakened or killed form of the virus (or a small part of it). It’s called an antigen. When you get a vaccine, your immune system recognizes the antigen as foreign. This causes the immune cells to kill the disease-causing virus and make antibodies against it. Later on, if you come into contact with the actual virus, your immune system remembers this and produces the right antibodies to kill the virus.

In contrast, the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” did not contain a piece of the COVID-19 virus. So they are technically not vaccines at all. Instead, they both use messenger RNA (mRNA) technology to instruct your cells to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein which causes your immune system to produce antibodies. So I will no longer refer to them as “vaccines”. I’ll call them either shots or jabs.

Not only did they lie about masks and the effectiveness of HCQ and ivermectin. They also lied about herd immunity and natural immunity. The WHO actually changed the definition of herd immunity to support its promotion of mass vaccination of the world’s population. In June 2020, WHO’s website gave the following definition of the term:

Herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”

By October 2020, WHO changed the definition to:

“Herd immunity”, also known as “population immunity”, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.

How convenient. How deceptive. They simply dropped the part about immunity being developed by previous infection. Their motive was obvious. They wanted to give the impression that the only way to get herd immunity was through vaccination. But that was not true.

In February 2024, a Florida grand jury concluded that lockdowns did more harm than good and that masks were ineffective at stopping COVID-19 transmission. The same month, the results of a study of 99 million jabbed people showed that they had significantly higher risks of myocarditis after the mRNA shots, as well as increased risks of pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome and other diseases.

The Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States reported that, as of March 29, 2024, there were 37,382 deaths, 215,734 hospitalizations, 21,616 heart attacks and 28,299 myocarditis and pericarditis cases following administration of the mRNA shots. These are only a small fraction of the actual incidences of adverse effects since most of them go unreported.

Then a study from Saudi Arabia reported that more than 25 percent of the participants had reported cardiac complications after receiving mRNA vaccines. Almost 15 percent experienced symptoms within one month of vaccination while others reported issues up to 12 months or longer.

More recently, a study found that mass COVID-19 vaccination not only failed, but made things worse with the highest death surges in the most heavily vaccinated populations.

Is there evidence to support the belief that the pandemic was planned in advance? Was the pandemic in fact a plandemic? I have already made reference to Event 201, the so-called pandemic preparedness simulation that took place in October 2019, just 10 weeks before the COVID-19 outbreak first began in Wuhan, China. But there is evidence that serious pandemic planning began several years before that.

In 2015, Bill Gates conceived the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). He made plans for its development with Klaus Schwab at the January 2016 World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland and unveiled it at the January 2017 WEF. On July 17, 2017, CEPI made a detailed presentation of a master plan for the coming pandemic to the World Health Organization. The master plan outlined a global collaboration that would oversee future pandemics, bypassing the various officially-elected government bodies of the world.

As stated by Dr. Peter Breggin and his wife in their book COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey, “from the beginning, all this planning had the dual goals of making money from vaccines, while imposing global dominance through an alliance of billionaires, individual countries, philanthropic organizations, and corporations – essentially the Great Reset … In early 2017 – three years before COVID-19 – Bill Gates was already deeply involved with funding and discussing in public what [former] President Trump would later unveil as Operation Warp Speed … A central aim was to rapidly produce innovative vaccines without the usual FDA procedures that should ensure safety and effectiveness.”

In other words, the foundation of Operation Warp Speed in 2020 was already beyond the drawing board and in production in 2017. Operation Warp Speed sprang from the collective minds of Bill Gates and the pharmaceutical industry.

On January 10, 2017, a few days before former President Trump’s inauguration, Dr. Anthony Fauci, former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, gave a speech at a conference titled Pandemic Preparedness in the Next Administration in Washington, D.C. In his speech, Dr. Fauci stated “there is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the area of infectious diseases … but also, there will be a surprise outbreak.” Question: how can a person predict a “surprise” with such certainty without actually knowing about it in advance? If you can predict a future event, it is not a surprise. Clearly, Dr. Fauci was in on the plans.

Not only did Pfizer and Moderna reap billions off the so-called “vaccines” (with full indemnity against law suits for injuries or deaths), billionaires and other global elites got richer while economies around the world were devastated and countless people lost their livelihoods. Ironically, experience has shown that the so-called vaccines were neither safe nor effective. Claims that the shots would prevent infection and transmission were fraudulent.

Many people that got “fully vaccinated” against COVID-19 caught it anyway, and were often more sick than those who refused the shots and became infected by the virus. The accidental (or intentional) leak of the COVID-19 virus from the lab in Wuhan, China, together with the unsafe and ineffective “vaccines”, were a grand experiment in totalitarian control fueled by fear.

The fact that there are still people wearing masks in public places is evidence of the success of this diabolical brain-washing and fear-mongering experiment. A statement attributed to Mark Twain is relevant here: “It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled.” Governments and the pharmaceutical-industrial complex told everyone to “trust the science.” The global elites wanted to see how compliant we would be.

A lot of people complied and got the shots. But a lot people refused to comply and didn’t. They stood their ground. And some of them launched lawsuits against the COVID mandates, governments and the pharmaceutical companies.

On November 2023, the Attorney General for the State of Texas announced that Texas had sued Pfizer for unlawfully misrepresenting the effectiveness of the company’s “vaccine” and attempting to censor public discussion of the product in violation of Texas’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Pfizer touted that the shots had a “95% efficacy” while its own data showed that the “vaccine” was only 0.85% effective in reducing the likelihood that an individual would contract COVID-19 (known as absolute risk reduction). The lawsuit is an attempt by the Texas Attorney General to bring accountability for the fraud that resulted in record profits for the pharmaceutical industry. It is unfortunate that no similar lawsuit has been filed by a Canadian Attorney General.

At a press conference held in Geneva, Switzerland in April 2024, Dr. Masayasu Inoue, a world-renowned Japanese professor, called the COVID-19 pandemic a man-made hoax that was orchestrated by a network of globalist organizations, including the United Nations, the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum. He claimed that their global vaccination agenda fraudulently used an experimental gene therapy and inhumanely pushed it on healthy people. There is much evidence to support his claims. 

On April 28, 2024, the Arizona Republican Party unanimously passed a resolution declaring the COVID-19 itself and the COVID-19 mRNA injections to be “biological and technological weapons.” The resolution calls upon the Governor of Arizona to “prohibit the sale and distribution of COVID injections and all mRNA injections in Arizona and for the Arizona Attorney General to seize all COVID injections and mRNA injections in Arizona and perform a forensic analysis on these so-called vaccines.”